| TacticalGunFan Opinion | Revolvers Still A Viable Option |
| Written by Robert Kolesar | |||||||||||
| Friday, 24 July 2009 | |||||||||||
I guess I'm dating myself by writing this article, but I think it's a very appropriate topic for discussion, especially on a site such as TacticalGunFan. Newer shooters like the latest in automatic and semi-automatic weapons (and rightfully so) and want to read about them. But let's not lose sight of what can still work now in the 21st entury, even though polymers, plastic and striker-fired pistols have become standard issue. Just bear with me and consider what may be another option for you, based on my experience.
Firepower (that's the main reason for the switch to semi-auto pistols, isn't it?) is a good thing. In a firefight, I want as many rounds as I can carry. Any combat vet will agree to that. But there are other uses for a handgun besides combat, and that's what we're looking at here. As a young Los Angeles policeman, I started out with a 4-inch .38 and a couple of speed loaders; I didn't feel sorry for myself when I went to work every night in the south end of the city. I added a 2-inch .38 as a back-up (almost all L.A. street cops carry two guns) and felt very well-armed. The criminal element in Los Angeles was just as heavily armed in the 1980s as now, and probably more violent. I transitioned to a Beretta 92 and later a .45 S&W before retiring a year ago. But I still carried a succession of 2-inch .38s for back-up, undercover and off-duty.
![]() This 70 year-old Colt .38 will still outshoot most new semi-autos. A superb trigger and excellent intrinsic accuracy also mean that practice is fun and rewarding. (Photo: Robert Kolesar) I liked carrying the Beretta and other semi-autos, but if I were working the mean streets of L.A. again, I wouldn't mind packing my old S&W .38. A few old-timers in there are still carrying .38s - their numbers shrinking daily with each retirement. I carry a handgun everywhere I go since graduating from the LAPD Academy in 1984. I tried the full-sized pistol thing, but it wasn't for me. Off-duty, of course, is different than plainclothes work, where the expectation of trouble is much greater. If you're on duty, a full-sized gun is probably mandated anyway, unless you're working narcotics. My usual carry piece now is an S&W M442 in .38, holstered in a battered inside-the-waistband rig. Also along for the ride in my weak-side pocket is a Bianchi 6-round speed strip. I won't get involved in anything unless my life or my family's safety is threatened, so my little J-frame pop-gun is the right choice for me because it's small enough that I will carry it without thinking, unlike a larger auto. I know, there are many autos about as small as a five-shot Smith, but I like the little .38 and the lack of any substantial weight in the aluminum J-frame. It works because it's always on me instead of under the car seat or in the glove box if I need it.
![]() The author's 4-inch M67 LAPD duty revolver and his 649 2-inch back-up, which he carried his first years on the LAPD. Both work well in retirement as home defense and CCW weapons. (Photo: Robert Kolesar) Another couple of points in favor of the revolver are that they're easy to shoot well and ammo for practice is cheap and available. 9mm and .45 ammo is next to impossible to find now, but I still see .38 ammo in most stores. Revolvers are relatively inexpensive compared to most semi-autos and easily obtainable on the used market. And they're fun to shoot. Most any quality revolver will outshoot a comparable semi-auto, will have a better trigger and go a long way towards turning a beginner into a competent marksman. Okay, let's get tactical for a moment. Besides not looking cool anymore, the main argument against revolvers is the limitation of six rounds. About 99% of the time, that's not an issue. But what if you're confronted with multiple assailants? As a cop, soldier or even a homeowner, you've probably solved that problem by having heavier firepower available. But in the nightmare scenario I hear so often, you're confronted in a dark parking lot by several gangsters bent on robbing and killing you. Wouldn't the Glock 23 and a couple of spare magazines make more sense? Maybe, but always remember that tactics and coolness usually trumps any equipment issue. Not letting yourself get drawn into a bad situation is much more important than your armament. And I'll let you in on a little secret based upon 24 years of police work: bad guys don't go after people they think are armed.
![]() Another old favorite, an S&W M10-8 3-inch .38, modified to DAO by LAPD Armorers. The trigger face was also polished for DA work and the action tuned. A superb carry revolver. (Photo: Robert Kolesar) This accomplishes two things: one, the felony has already occurred and there is no doubt what happened, and two, it gets the bad guys away from any innocent people who could be injured if you reacted in the middle of the crime. It always looks better if you tried to avoid a shooting around innocent bystanders. I'm not bad-mouthing anyone's choice of weapon here; any handgun beats your fists when you need it. I just believe, based on some pretty extensive experience, that a revolver for most people would work quite nicely. Do I dislike semis? Nope, I own quite a few, carried several different autos in both combat and patrol and still shoot bullseye with one. I just think that most shooters should consider a revolver for their defense and target-shooting needs. A revolver is still a viable option for today's gun owner. The opinions contained in this column are those of the author and not necessarily those of TacticalGunFan or its staff.
Comments (5)
![]()
Thilo
said:
|
|||||||||||
|
Nice read, Sir! While I am not terribly old, I still find the revolver a viable choice. Unfortunately I do not own one, but I think that there is no other handgun - pistol or revolver - that would make me feel as safe as a factory-stock S&W model 25-5, 4-inch barrel, chambered for the .45 "long" Colt cartridge. I am not American but I'd like to thank you for your police and military service anyway. |
Kevin
said:
| The S&W J Frame or any well made pocket pistol revolver has been a reliable defender for any person who takes the time and make the effort to learn to use it properly. My S&W 640 is my BUG at work and has been 100% reliable for nearly 20 yrs. A well written article and solid points for the pocket pistol. The handiness of a pocket pistol revolver provides the user a sense of not being a sheep, badguys watchout. |
Scott
said:
| Great article!I carry a Model 36 daily in my front pocket and 2 speed strips in a cell phone holster. |
Bob
said:
|
Thanks, Chuck. Those 649 stocks are Micarta, made by the late John Hurst of Los Angeles. He was a champion pistol shot as well as an LA copper and master grip maker. |
Chuck
said:
|
Good article. I too carry J frames as BUGs, even though the younger guys often look at me like I'm a martian when I suggest a revolver for BUG use. I'd sure like to know what grips the author has on the 649 in the article photo. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



I guess I'm dating myself by writing this article, but I think it's a very appropriate topic for discussion, especially on a site such as TacticalGunFan. Newer shooters like the latest in automatic and semi-automatic weapons (and rightfully so) and want to read about them. But let's not lose sight of what can still work now in the 21st entury, even though polymers, plastic and striker-fired pistols have become standard issue. Just bear with me and consider what may be another option for you, based on my experience.




Copyright © 2010 OutdoorsFan Media and InterMedia Outdoors, Inc. All rights
reserved.